Showing posts with label Literary Criticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Literary Criticism. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Forum Thread: In 2111, What 2011 Poets Will Our Academic Descendants be Reading and Assigning?



Bump.

This post originally appeared on this site on April 9, 2008, when Poets.net was still very young. I believe this question is worthy of another look.

As Bugzita on Foetry (Reply #34, November 28, 2006), I posted the following:

Quite frankly, most poetry published today would not pass "The Uncle Lyle Test." My Uncle Lyle is an ordinary Joe who likes to read, which I did not know until he read my first book (which sort of passed the test, but not entirely--oh, well).

Say what you will about bestsellers, but they are bestsellers because they pass the test imposed by the Uncle Lyles of the reading world. Now if your work is so rarified that it leaves most readers scratching their heads, that's fine, and there's something to be said for creating work that excludes all but a few insiders--academia does it all the time. That's a choice, and I respect that.

But I have a problem when these rarified poets start whining and moaning because no one wants read or buy their books. So some of them resort to dishonest methods to drum up bogus awards, which, from what I can see, are based less on quality of work and more on how well-connected they are. So everyone sets up a "press," and poets publish each other's poetry, no matter the quality: "Wink, Wink." To those not in the know, it all looks very respectable.

The problem is: the published work itself becomes insular and not all that interesting to the average reader. And because most readers are average in terms of intellect and tastes, the rarified poets' books sell, perhaps, one or two hundred copies, sold to other poets. Of course there are always exceptions, but, unfortunately, this insularity seems to be the norm.

And you wonder why poetry no longer matters? :?:

Bugz

So, then, in 2008 (2011), as Jennifer, I pose the following questions for your consideration and opinion:

In 2111, what 2011 poets will be considered as literary representatives of our era, their works published in The Norton Anthology (2111 edition) and assigned by our academic descendants to school children and college students? If you wish, support your supposition with details.

Conversely, what 2011 poets will slide into obscurity? If you wish, support your supposition with details.

Related thread: "Is Poetry Dead?"

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Book Review Thread: Academic non-fiction (Literary Criticism, Literary Theory, Textbooks)

Have you recently read compelling or just plain silly academic non-fiction?

Here's the thread for you.

This thread is open to those of you who want to review academic non-fiction: literary criticism, literary theory, even textbooks.

The first signed (not anonymous) and quality review (negative or positive), will be elevated into this post.

Some Guidelines and Caveats:

  • No Self-Promotion. There is another thread for self-promoting your work. However, you may add an link to where one can buy and/or see more information about and other reviews of the book.

  • You may use this thread only; book reviews in other comment or incorrect genre threads will be moved or deleted.

  • By posting a negative or even neutral review, you do leave yourself open to attack by unhappy and angry authors about your review, and these comments will not be deleted.

  • Anyone may comment on your review, including reviewed authors. If you are an author, you are welcome to respond to the review, but you may not self-promote in this thread. Instead, go to the self-promotion thread. Self-promoting comments will be deleted from this thread.

Questions? Email me

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

MARCH 19, 2009, ANNOUNCEMENT: Forum is Up and Running Again! Poets.net Review Seeks Book Review, Literary Criticism, and Interview Submissions

*

The Poets.net forum has been moved to a new structure and is now available to new members; if you joined before October 11, 2008, your membership has carried over to the new forum. If you're not sure, just try signing in.

Here's the new link:


Poets.net Review, a new sister site to Poets.net, publishes book reviews, literary criticism, and interviews. Information on submitting appears on that site, left panel.

Poets.net will continue publishing public domain works and is now actively seeking new creative work.

In that spirit, Poets.net welcomes submissions of poems, short stories, creative non-fiction, short plays, and stand-alone excerpts. (Please see the left side panel for guidelines and email the editor).

One thing for certain: neither site will ever sponsor fee-based literary contests or charge reading fees. Period.

We simply plan to publish the best work available, including that of writers unknown to us and friends. However, our sites will never act as favor-trading outlets for friends and professional colleagues.

See Friends, Publishing, and Writer! Writer! for our views on publishing the work of friends.

We are Indies




If you are an Indie writer,

please consider joining



on Facebook.