Friday, May 30, 2008
1984 in 2008?
Posted by Jennifer at 10:04 AM
Labels: censorship, forum, forum decorum, oppression in poetry, satire, snark, suppression in poetry
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
We are Indies
If you are an Indie writer,
please consider joining
running out of ideas already?ReplyDelete
You're one of those nameless chickenshit troll things I heard about, right?ReplyDelete
And you'd be a flamer, right?ReplyDelete
More of a farmer than a flamer.ReplyDelete
Please forgive my
digital ignorance...I'm just an old bibliophile.
Please define 'flamer' and I'll tell you if I am.
Don't worry about it; you're not even close to being a flamer.
Here's a pretty good definition of Flamer Personality Disorder:
Hey, Anonymous, you with the track suit as if you were a runner--ReplyDelete
Those sheep are pretty healthy even if the windmill is old. And you know what as well, an old windmill is a more potent image than a young one anyway--every poet knows that, though apparently the idea hadn't occurred to you.
So what ideas do occur to you?
Oh, you've run already.
Namecaller: This defines flamers. "Flamer" means "namecaller."ReplyDelete
Well, anonymous, I calls 'em as I sees 'em.
Now here's one for you. Look up 'sniper'. That's what I would call chickenshit.
Quite honestly, you guys, why isn't "namecaller" or "sniper" good enough?ReplyDelete
The moment you slip into language like "flaming" and "chickenshit," anything you say is just cyber-babble with no face or conscious function. You might as well just keep on playing computer games, I'd say, because you've become as passive as a spectator at the Colisseum. Such language is like that of the goons in A Clockwork Orange with no heart or engagement with anything!
It can even do violence without tears!
Hey Gary, it's perfectly acceptable to post anonymously here. Character assasinations are also perfectly acceptable apparently, so I'd be a fucking idiot to leave my personal details wouldn't I.ReplyDelete
If you want to call me chickenshit that's hardly going to bother me.
Now back to your farm, haven't you got some animals to husband or something.
Did I misread your original post?
running out of ideas already?"
I found that to be somewhat insulting, so I replied. This site is becoming very important to poetry, especially "outsider' poetry (the really good stuff that your grandkids will read). Why do you feel a need to degrade it? Do you have a personal stake here?
Also, when I first started posting at various places I used pseudonyms as well. How silly. Unless you're John Ashbery or Franz Wright or Gary Snyder you're basically anonymous anyway, aren't you?
As far as 'character assassination' (you should work on your spelling), my poetry has been out there for sale for three years now with two more books to come. Go for it! Trash my stuff. That, after all, is the only real measure of a poet, not some superfluous comment on a blog.
We "...slip into language like "flaming" and "chickenshit," because these are words and they have meanings required for the emotion of the moment (it's called writing). It's valid communication, contentious or not. You will find much worse in contemporary poetry.
Why would you find my original post insulting? It wasn't directed at you. I was merely commenting on the fact that the host put a pretty ordinary and unimaginative pot-shot out there, received no response and then bumped it back up to the front page again. That, to me, signalled a distinct lack of ideas and imagination.
BTW--this site is not and never will be 'important to poetry'either, don't kid yourself.
So, obviously, you DO have a personal stake. How can you predict the future?ReplyDelete
Dear Other Anonymous,ReplyDelete
Attacking me for posting anonymously, while posting anonymously yourself, is pretty funny dontcha think?
If you had the capacity for coherent thought I'd be happy to engage with you in your discussion of 'potent windmills' and 'healthy sheep'. WTF?
It smells like Kansas in here.ReplyDelete
Smells like s'bunch of sour grapes...ReplyDelete
I have a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.ReplyDelete
Poets.net is the belly of the beast.
People from Kansas are good people.
I don't see why Poets.net has to be so impolite!
It offends me. Poets are supposed to have manners.
The irony is that sour grapes are indigestible, rotten grapes delicious if you just ignore the puckered skin and syrupy odor.ReplyDelete
Seriously, as another older man I've come to find ignoring shelf-life beautiful!
What great poet can you name that had good manners?ReplyDelete
How do you define good manners, behavior arising out of what people really feel or out of what they would like other people to think they are feeling?ReplyDelete
The blackbird whistling or just after?
"Important to poetry?"
I thought you might have a point there and read through the whole site. Are they into "character assassination?" Well, if a website is a character you'd be right, because they certainly hit on Poets.org and Pw.org for sheltering celebrity mischief.
Are the facts there to substantiate the cover-ups they claim? Most certainly, I'd say, and substantial--and the deletions and locked threads just high-light what they say.
What about the mischief?
Been out there for 18 months or more now. Nobody disputes the facts that I know of--not a single law suit launched, and lawyers engaged only to harass the whistle blowers. With regard to those, as far as I know all of the suits have been settled in favor of the defendants!
Important to poetry? You're the first to have said it, Anonymous, and maybe you've got a point.
But where from here is my question?
That's the true challenge for you guys. You're proving your cases, but what are you going to do with the spoils? A lot of important peoples' reputations are on the line now, some of them hoist with their own petards (Tupelo had the best Guidelines in the industry!).
Anyone ready to address that? Poetry after Foetry?
"Poetry after Foetry?"ReplyDelete
This is poetry after Foetry, right here!
And it's my dream that we can all contribute. I was a victim--I can deal with that. I'd like my abusers to feel free to come in too--like truth and reconciliation in South Africa, we're all in this equally together!.
Because I'm sure that some of you that are speaking up now on Poets.net are actually on the other side, and I don't mean as cheats or facilitators but more like co-dependents, people who got sucked into defending the PoBiz status quo unconsciously, and thus helping to make it work even without understanding how much damage you were doing. In fact, I think many of you were just like me, because the situation was unthinkable for me, you see, and that's why I just kept on sending out and sending out my precious work for years without suspecting anything!
None of us had the eyes to see this, or the ears to hear even our own cries of outrage and despair. Yes, that strong!
Now we need to move on--but moving on does not mean moving on just as we are. It means a whole rethink of American poetry, and what it means to be an American poet. Because this is uniquely our own, national problem--it doesn't exist anywhere else in the world, not even in Canada!.
Jorie Graham is such a great poet!ReplyDelete
Doesn't that matter to you???
Anonymous asked: "What great poet can you name that [sic] had good manners?"ReplyDelete
From personal experience:
...to name a few.
Why "that [sic]"? Might it not be that Anonymous was referring to the function rather than the person?ReplyDelete
Big difference indeed between "soldier that" and "soldier who!"
I mean, that's a petty observation, but you started it!
And what's your point anyway? If you agree with the statement that poets ought to have good manners, which I must say is an interesting position, then why don't you discuss that obligation instead of belittling Anonymous' grammar?
Finally, so what if Jorie Graham is a great poet? Does that mean she is entitled to write her own interview? Obviously Jorie Graham feels she is, because if we are to trust The Academy of American Poets she did--which is indeed the whole point of this site, I think, i.e. both what Jorie Graham does and how The Academy of American Poets accommodates.
Why not work a bit on that?